Postoperative Pain Comparison: Manual K-Files vs Pedoflex Rotary Files in Primary Molar Root Canals

Authors

  • Astha Vyas Consultant Pedodontist, Vashi, Navi Mumbai, India. Author
  • Rita Poptani MDS, Pediatric and Preventative Dentistry, Medixglam Dental and Facial Aesthetic Clinic, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Author
  • Shifa Shahabuddin Parkar Postgraduate Student, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, M.A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Science and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Author
  • Lekshmi V MDS, Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kollam, Kerala, India. Author
  • Niharika Sowki Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Preventive Dentistry, Army College of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, India. Author
  • Rajashekhar Rodda Consultant Pediatric Dentist, Hyderabad, India. Author

Keywords:

Pulpectomy, Deciduous tooth, Rotary files

Abstract

This study evaluated postoperative pain in pediatric  patients after root canal treatment with two file systems:  Manual K-files and Pedoflex Rotary files. Sixty children,  aged 6-10, were randomized into two groups of 30. Pain  was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6, 12,  24, and 48 hours post-treatment. Results showed  significantly lower pain levels in the Pedoflex Rotary file  group at all time points (mean VAS at 6 hours: 2.4 vs. 3.8;  at 12 hours: 1.8 vs. 3.2; at 24 hours: 1.2 vs. 2.5; at 48 hours:  0.6 vs. 1.8). Pedoflex Rotary files provide a more  comfortable postoperative experience. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Tyagi R, Khatri A, Kalra N, Sabherwal P. Comparative Evaluation of Hand K-flex Files, Pediatric Rotary Files, and Reciprocating Files on Instrumentation Time, Postoperative Pain, and Child's Behavior in 4-8-year-old Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(2):201-206.

2. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent.2017;11(3):376–379.

3. Rosa FM, Modesto A, Faraco-Junior IM. Manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for root canal preparation in primary molars. Dentistry. 2014;2(1):1–5. 4. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22(1):77–78.

5. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Emg S, Vishawanathaiah S. Assessment of Quality of Obturation, Instrumentation Time and Intensity of Pain with Pediatric Rotary File (Kedo-S) in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11(6):462-467.

6. Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Subramanian EMG, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Its Effect on Postoperative Pain between Pediatric Hand and Rotary Files: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(1):88–96.

7. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S files in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(5):467-472.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Postoperative Pain Comparison: Manual K-Files vs Pedoflex Rotary Files in Primary Molar Root Canals. (2024). Academia Journal of Medicine, 7(2), 19-23. https://medjournal.co.in/index.php/ajm/article/view/53